Governar a abertura: ciência aberta, pressão métrica e crise editorial na reconfiguração do poder da comunicação científica
Barra lateral de artigos
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
Este artigo analisa a ciência aberta como horizonte normativo e técnico e examina a crise contemporânea da publicação acadêmica sob um regime de métricas e incentivos que reconfigura o que conta como “qualidade”, quem acessa a publicação e como o prestígio circula. Com base em uma revisão narrativa e seletiva de literatura revisada por pares (2021–2026) e em documentos oficiais e padrões (UNESCO, OECD, Comissão Europeia, NIH/OSTP, cOAlition S/Plan S, DOAJ, COPE, Crossref, DataCite, NISO, Clarivate e Scopus), argumenta-se que a abertura não é apenas um conjunto de práticas, mas um arranjo de infraestrutura, governança e avaliação responsável. Mostra-se que a combinação de aceleração dos fluxos editoriais, opacidades na revisão por pares e nos dados, concentração industrial, economias baseadas em APC e extrativismo de metadados é amplificada por indicadores (JIF, CiteScore, SJR/SNIP, h-index, Altmetrics) que operam como dispositivos de poder. O trabalho propõe uma reconfiguração teórica: deslocar o foco de “mudar o modelo de revista” para “mudar o regime” — infraestrutura aberta, avaliação responsável e economia política — para sustentar velocidade e rastreabilidade sem sacrificar rigor, equidade nem autonomia epistêmica, com atenção particular às trajetórias latino-americanas de acesso aberto diamante.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.downloads##
Detalhes do artigo
Edição
Seção
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Política de Difusión Libre en la Revista Discimus
La revista Discimus tiene el compromiso de promover la libre circulación del conocimiento científico y académico, garantizando al mismo tiempo el reconocimiento adecuado a nuestros autores y respetando los principios éticos de la publicación científica. Con este objetivo, Discimus publica todos sus artículos bajo la licencia ATRIBUCIÓN-NOCOMERCIAL-COMPARTIRIGUAL 4.0 INTERNACIONAL CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
¿Qué significa esto para los autores, lectores y la comunidad científica?
CC (Creative Commons): Indica que la obra está bajo una licencia Creative Commons, lo que significa que se puede compartir y reutilizar bajo ciertas condiciones especificadas.
Como Citar
Referências
Abdalla, B. A., Mustafa, A. M., Fattah, F. H., Kakamad, F. H., Omar, S. S., Salih, A. M., et al. (2025). Self-citation pattern among world’s top 2% of the scientists. *Heliyon, 11*(3), e42471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42471
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (ANID)/SciELO Chile. (2024). SciELO Chile en números: Colección y estadísticas. https://scielo.conicyt.cl/
arXiv. (2024). *arXiv annual report 2023*. Cornell University Library. https://arxiv.org/about/reports/2023
Avendaño Rondón, L. (2024). Tratado de Ciencia Abierta: una crítica a los costos por publicación y visualización en la academia. Discimus. Revista Digital De Educación, 3(1), 4-8. https://doi.org/10.61447/20240601/editorial
arXiv. (2024b). arXiv submission rate statistics (monthly). Cornell University Library. https://arxiv.org/stats/monthly_submissions
Basson, I., & Blanckenberg, J. P. (2021). Do open access journal articles experience a citation advantage? Results and implications for open access publishing. *Scientometrics, 126*(12), 10179–10212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04169-2
Clarivate. (2025, May 15). Journal Citation Reports 2025: Addressing retractions and strengthening research integrity. https://clarivate.com/news/
CoARA. (2022). *Agreement on reforming research assessment*. Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment. https://coara.eu/agreement/the-agreement-full-text/
COPE. (2025). Citation manipulation. Committee on Publication Ethics. https://publicationethics.org/citation-manipulation
COPE, & STM. (2022). *Paper mills — Research report* (2nd ed.). Committee on Publication Ethics; International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers. https://publicationethics.org/resources/research-reports/paper-mills-research-report
Crossref. (2025b). Community. https://www.crossref.org/categories/community
cOAlition S. (2024). Diamond open access. https://www.coalition-s.org/diamond-open-access/
cOAlition S. (2025). DIAMAS: Guidelines and recommendations for strengthening diamond open access. https://www.coalition-s.org/
KELLNER, A.W.A. Uno de los grandes dilemas de los editores de revistas científicas: cobrar o no cobrar, ¡esa es la cuestión! [online]. SciELO en Perspectiva, 2023 [viewed 28 January 2026]. Available from: https://blog.scielo.org/es/2023/10/31/uno-de-los-grandes-dilemas-de-los-editores-de-revistas-cientificas-cobrar-o-no-cobrar-esa-es-la-cuestion/
DataCite. (2025a, October 20). 100 million DataCite DOIs: More than just a number. DataCite. https://datacite.org/blog/100-million-datacite-dois/
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). (2026, January 13). Are Latin American journals making progress on article processing charges? https://www.doaj.org/blog/
DORA. (2026). Signers. San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. https://sfdora.org/signers/
European Commission. (n.d.). Open science. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/strategy/strategy-2020-2024/our-digital-future/open-science_en
Fong, E. A., Wilhite, A. W., & Rupp, D. E. (2023). Coercive citations: How journal editorial practices can shape the academic record. *Research Policy, 52*(8), 104860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104860
Haustein, S., et al. (2024). A systematic analysis of global article processing charge (APC) payments, 2019–2023. *arXiv*. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.00815
Ibrahim, H., Liu, F., Zaki, Y. et al. Citation manipulation through citation mills and pre-print servers. Sci Rep 15, 5480 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88709-7
Kojaku S, Livan G, Masuda N. Detecting anomalous citation groups in journal networks. Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 15;11(1):14524. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93572-3. Erratum in: Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 29;12(1):14698. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19033-7. PMID: 34267254; PMCID: PMC8282695.
Langham-Putrow, A., Bakker, C., & Riegelman, A. (2021). Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles. *PLOS ONE, 16*(6), e0253129. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253129
National Institutes of Health. (2025, February 10). Accelerating implementation of the NIH 2024 public access policy. NIH Extramural Nexus. https://grants.nih.gov/news-events/nih-extramural-nexus-news/2025/05/accelerating-implementation-of-the-nih-2024-public-access-policy
National Science Board/National Science Foundation. (2025). *Gold open access publishing* (NSB-2025-347). National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf25347
Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2022). *Ensuring free, immediate, and equitable access to federally funded research* (Memorandum, Aug 25, 2022). The White House. https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/08-2022-OSTP-Public-Access-Memo.pdf
openRxiv. (2025). 2025 year in review: bioRxiv & medRxiv. https://openrxiv.org/2025-year-in-review/
OpenAIRE. (2023). OpenAIRE guidelines for literature, institutional and thematic repositories (v4.0). https://www.openaire.eu/openaire-guidelines-for-literature-institutional-and-thematic-repositories
Quincho-Lopez, A., et al. (2024). Journal and publisher self-citations and their impact on metrics: A large-scale analysis. *PLOS ONE, 19*(9), e0308110. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308110
Richardson RAK, Hong SS, Byrne JA, Stoeger T, Amaral LAN. The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Aug 12;122(32):e2420092122. doi:10.1073/pnas.2420092122. Epub 2025 Aug 4. PMID: 40758886; PMCID: PMC12358853.
Science Europe. (2022). Action plan for diamond open access. https://www.scienceeurope.org/media/t3jgyo3u/202203-diamond-oa-action-plan.pdf
Sharma, A., et al. (2024). Code sharing in clinical trial articles: A cross-sectional analysis. *BMJ, 386*, e078497. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-078497
Soto-Herrera, Diego Alejandro, Pallares, César, & Beigel, Fernanda. (2025). Costos de publicación en acceso abierto bajo el modelo APC: Argentina y Colombia. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 48(1), e357790. Epub November 11, 2025.https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rib.v48n1e357790
UNESCO. (2021). *Recomendación de la UNESCO sobre la Ciencia Abierta*. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949_spa
van Bellen S, Alperin JP, Larivière V (2025) Scholarly publishing’s hidden diversity: How exclusive databases sustain the oligopoly of academic publishers. PLoS One 20(6): e0327015. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0327015
Drivas, K. (2025). The role of online search platforms in scientific diffusion. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 76(3), 580–603. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24959